Article Correctness Is Author's Responsibility: Potential ethical pitfalls and dilemmas in the promotion and use of American Psychological Association-recommended treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder.

The article below may contain offensive and/or incorrect content.

A variety of potential unrecognized ethical concerns arise from the American Psychological Association's (APA, 2017) Clinical Practice Guideline for the Treatment of PTSD in Adults. In privileging short-term treatments that underscore symptom reduction as the predominant index of outcome, such as cognitive processing therapy and prolonged exposure, there is a susceptibility to mislead mental health professionals and clients alike to believe that lasting improvements in socioemotional well-being, and a time-intensive approach, are unrealistic, rather than realistic psychotherapy expectations. There are ethical implications to incompletely addressing clients' preferences and clinicians' judgments on matters such as preferred socioemotional outcomes, and desirable qualities in a therapist and therapy. As regard combat veterans, treating trauma-related guilt and shame as symptoms to be eliminated, rather than moral feelings to be acknowledged, expressed, and self-forgiven, warrants special ethical consideration. The high dropout rates of cognitive processing therapy and prolonged exposure raise questions as to whether their protocol-driven methods alienate substantial numbers of traumatized clients. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)